McCain!

I honestly don't know how many Americans were watching the debates. McCain accuses Obama of Socialism, yet McCain voted for the $700 Billion bailout and he also supportes the Federal government buying of bad mortgages. McCain didn't speak out against the US governments buying into the US banking industry. McCain may not represent the obvious form of socialism but he still represents bigger government, more spending, and above all supports the failed foriegn policy that has lead to the major blowback that has resulted in the US being one of the most hated countries in the world. McCain still wants to send peace keeping troops to Georgia. Guys face reality and realize McCain and Obama both represent the same old form of Washington politics.

Yours in Libety,
Nate

Redistribution of Wealth?

Can you say Socialism 08?

A lot of Americans are saying it right now in a new form "Obama 08"!

Yours in Liberty,
Nate

Barry Goldwater: American Patriot

This is a 4 minute clip of Barry Goldwater's speech from the 1960's Republican Convention. Mr. Goldwater was dead on. Folks lets get excited... it's our Country and it's at stake! Vote Nov. 4th for the change that will bring true hope to America. Vote Libertarian!

Yours in Liberty,
Nate

Angry Politician!

We need more guys like this in Washington! I don't believe McCain or Obama. Neither get excited, animated, I don't honestly think they believe in the bs their campaigns push on the American people. They simply want to be President. They will say whatever best puts them into position to win the election. I want to see some politicians that have moral backbone! Believe in the policies they support. We need some people to get upset and decide to change things.

Experience?

I am confused on what exactly candidates need as far as experience is concerned. Conservatives point to Obama's short time in office and claim he doesn't have enough experience or knowledge to be President. Liberals fire back that Palin also has little experience considering she was only governor for 2 years of Alaska. So both sides have little experience. Both underlying supporters of the campaigns attack the other sides lack of experience. My question has to do with what experience is needed?

I feel experience is not needed to be President. Leadership, courage, strength to stand on what you believe in, is what is needed to be President. I know a couple people who could be President that have never served in office. A great candidate would be Stan Jones. If one has sound principals: small government, keep governement in Constitutional limits, physically conservative, defend civil liberties, non-interventionist foriegn policy, free markets, and Capitalism then you have the ingredients for successful government. One also needs a backbone and strength of character to stick to these principals once elected. I see many in Washington that have the "experience" the two sides throw out as a condition of the Presidency yet these "experienced" politicians voted for a $800+ Billion dollar bailout, these "experienced" lunatics sit idly by while the Government nationalizes the US banking industry! Is that the kind of experience we need? I mean if so I for one I don't want an experienced person as President.

Yours in Liberty,
Nate